New Zealands Government Drug Policy

New Zealands Government Drug Policy HOW THE EXISTING POLICY STARTED AND HOW IT WORKS New Zealand Government’s drug policy was enclosed in the National Drug Policy 2007 – 2012. This policy was first approved in 1998 to give direction for drug policy in Aoteoroa New Zealand as a whole. Within the framework provided by this policy, local government, non- government agencies and organizations that are part of the drug and alcohol sector developed their respective programs and set priorities. The National Drug Policy admits that drug use is mainly a health issue; therefore it should be addressed through health- based actions. New Zealand Drug policy was also created based on the principle of harm minimization. The main goal of NDP is to minimize the economic, social and health harms due to misuse of alcohol, tobacco and other drugs. In addition, the update of the National Drug Policy was built on the existing method (the three pillars) adapted by the government such as reducing demand, helping people with drug and alcohol problems and controlling drug supply. Significantly, the drug policy will also allow a larger support which will be given to the families and communities of those who misuse drugs as well as for children affected by alcohol and drugs living in households (Ministry of Health, 2013). ALCOHOL AND DRUG USE IN AOTEAROA NEW ZEALAND Existing research shows that drug use is high in Aotearoa New Zealand compared to other countries, predominantly for amphetamine, new psychoactive substances and cannabis. Alcohol is also considered by far the most significant leisure drug in New Zealand, when it comes to widespread use and misuse. Recent surveys shows that 95% of adult New Zealanders (aged 16- 64 years) also outlined drug related harm, drug use and had consumed alcohol at some point of their lifetime. This includes recreational drug use aside from tobacco and alcohol, together with prohibited drugs and drugs that are used for illegal purposes like diverted pharmaceuticals. Furthermore, almost half or 49% of all respondents had used any drugs for recreational purposes at some stage of their lives, roughly 1,292,700 people (Ministry of Health, 2010). The New Zealand government has responded to these issues of drug use by presenting different approaches that attempt to diminish drug use and other drug related harms. The first National Drug Policy in New Zealand covered the period 1998- 2003, since then it continuously provides guidance for the governments’ activities through to 2006. During that time, the National Drug Policy in collaboration with other government agencies and the Ministry of Health, reviewed the existing program until, the second National Drug Policy was implemented comprising the period 2007- 2012. OBJECTIVES AND THREE PILLARS OF THE NATIONAL DRUG POLICY New Zealand’s National Drug Policy presents Governments’ policy and legislative aims for alcohol, tobacco and prohibited drugs. The policy was built on the value of harm minimisation which covers a broad and combined approach to minimising the impairment or injuries caused by drug use comprising of the three ‘pillars’. First is the Supply control that aims to regulate and limit the availability of drugs. Second is the demand reduction, which involves a wide variety of activities that will restrict the use of drugs of individuals, which also includes abstinence. Lastly, the problem limitation which will reduce the harm that arises from existing drug use. The National Drug Policy makers believe that there is a wide range of harm linked with how drugs are being use and that there is no single strategy or tactic that can address the problems instead, a continuum plans are needed. This will require an improvement of a particular plan that is not just receptive, but also culturally suitable in addressing the necessities of Maori, Young and Pacific people provided the over representation of these groups in terms of many drug related problems THE POLICY MAKERS AND INTEREST GROUPS THEY REPRESENT The Minister of Health and the Chair of the Ministerial Committee on Drug Policy (MCDP) (National Drug Policy, 2007) in collaboration with other Ministerial colleagues, The (IACD) or Inter- Agency Committee on drugs and Expert Advisory Committee on Drugs (EACD) are the policy makers of NDP. As mentioned above, there is a wide range of issues concerning drug and alcohol usage in New Zealand. The NDP is one way of ensuring that these organizations that are involved in these issues take constant action in addressing them. In the past and even today, NDP primarily focuses or represents specific groups such as Maori, Pacific People and Young New Zealanders. Migrants in New Zealand are also considered as contributory factor because every community group has its own habits, attitudes and beliefs that can be very different from those of New Zealand’s culture and mainstream society. (Ministerial Committee on Drug Policy, 2007) BEHIND THE POLICY, STRATEGIES AND ACHEIVEMENTS The Ministry of Health, in association with other government and non-government organizations have their respective role on how to reduce and prevent harm caused by alcohol and other drugs. The NDP brings these diverse range of people, different agencies and stakeholders to work in partnership to be able to develop interventions, mechanism and right approach for the development of the policy. The publication of the first National Drug Policy in 1998, was also the release of several other significant national alcohol and drug policies, plans and strategies over the past years, such as National Strategic Framework for Alcohol and Drug Services in 2001, The National Alcohol Strategy in 2001 (NAS), Action Plan on Methamphetamines in 2003, The Action Plan on Alcohol and Illicit Drugs in 2004, In 2005 the Te Tahuhu (Mental Health and Addiction Plan), The Te Kokiri (Mental Health and Addiction Action Plan) in 2006 and the release of the second National Drug Policy in 2007 ( Ann Flintoft, 2008). Since the release of the first NDP there have been several significant achievements as well, these includes, the founding of the National Drug Policy Discretionary Grant Fund in 2004 which provides pool of funding research for latest projects to fill up gaps in all drug policy work. Aiming to provide funding for high cross- departmental projects, for a quick response to changes in current and developing drug trends. Alcohol Advisory Council (ALAC) with the primary objective of promotion and encouragement of moderation in the liquor use, reduction and discouragement of the misuse of liquor and minimization of the economic, social and personal harm that emanated from misuse of liquor, with the aim of change for all New Zealanders drinking culture. Community Action on Youth and Drugs (CAYAD) is a national project which involves partnership with communities, aiming to decrease harm to young people/ families/whanau from illegal drugs and alcohol. Smoke-free Environments Amendment Act 2003 , an amendment from the Smoke-free Environment Act of 1990, banned tobacco from buildings, school grounds, even licensed premises such as bars, sports clubs, cafes, restaurants and other workplaces became smoke-free indoors. Restrictions to the displays of tobacco products in retail outlets and further restrictions of access for those under age 18, herbal smoking products also has been banned under this act (Ministerial Committee on Drug Policy, 2007). KEEPING WHAT WORKS AND MAKING IT BETTER, TOWARDS A NEW DIRECTION We commend the Ministry of Health and all the policy makers of the NDP on their robust focus on reducing inequalities in the recent NDP. We believe that addressing the social determinants of health and reducing harm should continue to be the main principle of the National Drug Policy. We also applaud their past and recent achievements and support their plans by building on and just updating the policy from the previous NDP rather than changing it. In the previous policy, it focuses on interventions for those who are alcohol and drug users. It cannot be denied that this has been important for alcohol and drug user prevention with good effect for the broader community. However, we strongly believe that this policy can be updated for the better. We do believe that the existing policy is good, but it would be an advantage or would be better if the next National Drug Policy will expand or develop its definition of â€Å"harm† to give a greatly importance on the harm that other drugs and alcohol cause to the others aside from the users itself. The outdated National drug Policy focuses on prevention and reduction of harm between people who are alcohol and drug users. However, policy makers should also focus or give importance to communities, families and society that are greatly affected by the harm triggered by alcohol and drugs misuse, which can be in a form of ensuring that the involved groups (communities, families and soc iety) are protected by the policy. Furthermore, we also recommend that the new policy would focus more on the â€Å"outcomes† rather than just mentioning or educating people/society about certain substances and how to properly use these substances. The policy makers may talk or may emphasize about the ideal outcome for people and societies, such as aiming on reducing people’s access to cannabis and also try to decrease the number of young people being expelled from school because of drugs and alcohol violations. Lastly, we do support that the new policy uphold the principle of harm minimization and the three pillars of demand control, problem limitation and supply reduction. We believe that the existing structure is well aligned to what other countries do and guarantees that it is suitable for the purpose of reducing harm in New Zealand. References: Ministerial Committee on Drug Policy (2007). The National Drug Policy. Retrieved from http://www.health.govt.nz/system/files/documents/publications/national-drug-policy-2007-2012.pdf Ministry of Health (2013) The National drug Policy. Retrieved from http://www.health.govt.nz/our-work/mental-health-and-addictions/drug-policy/national-drug-policy Ann Flintoft (2008), How Good is New Zealand’s Alcohol and Drug Policy?. Addiction Treatment Research News, Volume 12. Retrieved from http://www.otago.ac.nz/nationaladdictioncentre/pdfs/atrn38v12.pdf At the heart of the matter. NZ Drug Foundation. Reshaping New Zealand’s Alcohol and other Drug Policy. Retrieved from http://www.drugfoundation.org.nz/wellington-declaration/declaration

Patients With Musculoskeletal Disorders Health And Social Care Essay

Jane Doe, a 22-year-old patient with no old medical history, nowadayss to the exigency section with ailment of low back hurting after stealing on a wet floor at work and falling. The patient states that the hurting is changeless hurting and radiates down both legs ( sciatica ) . The MRI shows pulled musculuss and ligaments environing the L4- L5 country. The exigency doctor provides the undermentioned discharge orders: Bed remainder with bathroom privileges for two yearss. Apply ice battalion to take down back for 20 proceedingss several times a twenty-four hours for the first 48 hours, and so get downing twenty-four hours three and on, use a warming tablet for 20 proceedingss on and 20 proceedingss off several times per twenty-four hours for the following several yearss as needed to alleviate hurting. Take 400 milligram of ibuprofen every six hours and 5 milligrams Flexeril ( Flexeril ) t.i.d. After two yearss of bed remainder, sit in chair three times per twenty-four hours for no mo re than 20 proceedingss. Ambulate around place and pace as tolerated, bit by bit increasing activity. Avoid distortion, bending, or making for objects. Avoid raising anything more than 5 lbs of weight for one hebdomad. See physician in one hebdomad for farther rating.Explain the principle for the disposal of ice for 48 hours followed by the application of heat.Explain the principle for the disposal of the isobutylphenyl propionic acid and musculus relaxer.What are the expected patient results for the patient in this instance survey?Case Study 2John Tuliro, a 32-year-old patient, is admitted to the medical-surgical unit after a gunshot lesion of the right lower leg infected with staphylococci was debrided. The patient is diagnosed with osteomyelitis. The patient ‘s right lower leg is warm to touch and dropsical, and the patient states that the appendage has a changeless pulsating hurting that increases with any motion of the leg. The patient ‘s sed rate and leucocyte rate s are elevated. The physician orders the followers for the patient: Admit to medical unit with critical marks every four hours Bed remainder Elevate affected leg on pillows above the degree of the bosom Warm sterile saline soaks for 20 proceedingss t.i.d. with wet-to-dry dressing alteration Levofloxacin ( Levaquin ) 750 milligram IVPB every twenty-four hours Renal profile, CBC with differential in A.M. Regular diet with high-protein addendum shingles Vitamin C 250 milligram Po b.i.d. Meperidine ( Demerol ) 100 milligram Po every four hours Docusate Na ( Colace ) 100 milligram b.i.d.The patient asks the nurse why he has to remain in bed. The nurse should supply what principle for this step?What nursing intercessions should the nurse provide the patient?( Individual )DISCUSS INDIVIDUAL AND LIFESTYLE RISK FACTORS FOR OSTEOPOROSISThe followers are the hazard factors of Osteoporosis: Geneticss – White or Asiatic, Female, Family History, Small Frame – Predisposes to moo bone mass Age – Postmenopause, Advanced Age, Low testosterone in work forces, decreased calcitonin – Hormones ( estrogen, calcitonin, and testosterone ) inhibit bone loss Nutrition – Low Calcium Intake, Low Vitamin D Intake, High Phosphate Intake, Inadequate Calories – Reduces foods needed for bone remodeling Physical Exercise – Sedentary, Lack of Weight Bearing Exercises, Low Weight and Body Mass Index – Boness needs emphasis for bone care Lifestyle Choices – Caffeine, Alcohol, Smoking, Lack of exposure to Sunlight – Reduces osteogenesis in bone remodeling Medicines – Cortocosteroids, antiseizure medicines, Lipo-Hepin, thyroid endocrine – affects calcium soaking up and metamorphosis Comorbidity – Anorexia Nervosa, Hyperthyroidism, Malabsorption Syndrome. Renal Failure – Affects calcium soaking up and metablosim Hormonal fluctuations are one of the grounds for gender differences when it comes to the development of osteoporosis. In adult females, estrogen has a function in relation to osteoporosis, while testosterone, estrogen and other endocrines in work forces besides relate to this. Besides, menopausal period in adult females histories for osteoporosis, low endogenous estrogen degrees increases the hazard. Lifestyle factors such as smoke, imbibing intoxicant and sedentary activities, besides increases the hazard for osteoporosis. Nutritional factors that increase the hazard, includes the undermentioned: day-to-day consumption that is less than 1000 – 1500 milligram of Ca and 400 – 600 International units of Vit. D. Eating high protein diet, imbibing caffeine, Na and P has negative consequence on Ca balance in the organic structure, hence, increasing hazard for osteoporosis. There are certain medicines that can impact bone remodeling, and increase hazard for secondary osteoporosis.DISCUSS THE DIFFERENCES IN MEDICAL MANAGEMENT FOR PRIMARY BONE TUMORS VERSUS METASTATIC BONE DISEASE.Primary bone tumour ‘s end of intervention is to destruct or take the tumour. It is accomplished by surgical exersion, radiation therapy if the tumour is radiosensitive, and chemotherapy. Limb-sparing processs are used to take the tumour and next tissue. Replacement of the affected tissue is really of import. This can be done through the undermentioned: customized prosthetic device, entire joint arthroplasty or bone tissue from the patient ( autoplasty ) or from cadaver giver ( homograft ) . Surgical remotion of the affected portion may necessitate amputation. To forestall metastasis of malignant bone tumour, chemotherapy is started before and continued after surgery, to eliminate micromestatic lesions. Alleviative direction is the intervention for metastatic bone malignant neoplastic disease. Its end is to alleviate hurting and uncomfortableness while advancing quality of life. Structural support and stabilisation is needed to forestall break, as the bone weakens. Contraceptive internal arrested development helps beef up big castanetss with metastatic lesions.DISCUSS CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS OF PAGET ‘S DISEASE, AND ITS PHARMACOLOGICAL TREATMENT FOR EACH.Paget ‘s disease are ab initio symptomless. The castanetss that are normally involved include the vertebrae, pelvic girdle, braincase, breastbone and proximal terminals of the long castanetss. Diagnosis of this disease is made by studies of bone hurting or malformation, through X ray or by sensing of elevated serum alkaline phosphate degrees found though biochemical testing. The followers are the most common ailments of patients who are enduring from Paget ‘s disease such as hurting. Skeletal malformation, and alteration in skin temperature. Joint disfunction may ensue from harm to gristle and degenerative arthritis. Bone hurting frequently occurs at dark, which is a consequence of increased force per unit area on the periosteum or associated hyperaemia. Other manifestations that can happen include lessened mobility and unsteady pace. Neurological complications can besides happen which is caused by nervus root compaction or nervus entrapment. These constructions are next to pagetic bone near a nervus hiatuss or canal. Common clinical manifestation of Paget ‘s disease is assorted sensorineural and conductive hearing loss. Low back hurting can besides happen because of vertebral organic structure and facet expansions, loss of lumbar hollow-back, dorsal humpback, spinal encroachment and altered pace kineticss. The short term aim in handling Paget ‘s disease is to relieve the associated bone hurting, while the long term aim, is to relieve the patterned advance of the disease. The pharmacologic therapy includes calcitonin, plimamycin, and Ga nitrate, and the biphosphonates. The chief end of this therapy is to command the disease activity, normalize biochemical parametric quantities and to better the symptoms.LIST REHABILITATION AND HEALTH EDUCATION STRATEGIES USED FOR PATIENT WITH LOW BACK PAIN.A comprehensive rehabilitation should include a careful rating for a specific end and interventions based on best grounds are exercising, cognitive behavioural intervention, wellness instruction and others. We should teach the patient to avoid return of the followers: Standing, sitting, lying and raising decently are necessary for a healthy dorsum. Alternate periods of activity with periods of remainder. Avoid prolonged sitting, standing and driving. Change places and remainder at frequent intervals. Avoid presuming tense, cramped places. Sit in a straight-back chair with the articulatio genuss somewhat higher than the hips. Use footrest if necessary. Flatten the hollow back by sitting with the natess tucked under. Pelvic tilt lessenings hollow-back. Avoid articulatio genus and hip extension. When driving a auto, have the place pushed frontward as necessary for comfort. Put a shock absorber in the little of the dorsum for support. When standing for any length of clip, rest one pes on a little stool or platform to alleviate lumbar lurdosis. Avoid weariness, which contributes to spasm of back musculuss. Use good organic structure mechanics when lifting and traveling approximately. Daily exercising is of import in the bar of back jobs. Make prescribed back exercisings twice daily strengthens back, leg, and abdominal musculuss. Walking out-of-doorss is recommended. Reduce weight if necessary lessenings strain on back musculuss.IDENTIFY COMMON FOOT DISORDERS. IDENTIFY THE SPECIFIC STRUCTURE INVOLVED.Common Foot Disorders: Plantar Fascitis – it is a plantar heel hurting, which evolves from the bone ( list goad ) or plantar facia. Morton ‘s Neuroma – It is the annoyance and devolution of the digital nervousnesss in the toes that produces a painful mass near the country of metatarsals. Hallux Disorders: Valgus, Rigidus, and Sprains – Acute hurt to the ligaments and capsule of the MTP articulation. Lateral divergence of the first toe greater than the the normal angle of 15 grades between the tarsus and metatarsus This may take to a painful prominence of the medical facet of the MTP articulation. Degenerative status of the first MTP articulation taking to trouble and stiffness.DISCUSS THE INVOLVEMENT OF VITAMIN D IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF OSTEOMALACIA. IDENTIFY TREATMENT RELATED TO CAUSE.Vitamin D lack is the most common cause of osteomalacia. Essential for Ca and P metamorphosis is Vitamin D, it is the critical elements in mineralization of the bone. The major beginning of Vitamin D is synthesis in the tegument exposed to sunlight. Dietary alteration is needed by eating nutrient rich in Vitamin D, such as fatty fish oils, liver and egg yolks. Vitamin D addendum is besides suggested.Develop A Plan OF CARE FOR AN ASSIGNED PATIENT WITH LOW BACK PAIN.Nursing Interven tion for Low Back Pain: Relieving Pain Advise patient to remain active and avoid bed remainder, in most instances. Keep pillow between flexed articulatio genuss while in side-lying place minimizes strain on dorsum musculuss Apply heat or ice as prescribed. Administer or learn self-administration of hurting medicines and musculus relaxant. Promoting Mobility Encourage ROM of all uninvolved musculus groups. Suggest gradual addition in activities and jumping activities with remainder in semi-fowler ‘s place. Avoid prolonged periods of sitting, standing, or lying down. Promote patient to discourse jobs that may be lending to backache. Promote patient to make order back exercisings. Exercise keeps postural musculuss strong, helps recondition the dorsum and abdominal muscular structure, a and serves as an mercantile establishment for emotional tenseness.Give A TEMPLATE, COMPLETE A DISEASE MAP ON A PATIENT WITH CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME.Picture1.pngComplete A THEORETICAL CASE STUDY ON AN ACTUAL CLINICAL PATIENT WITH OSTEOMYELITIS.hypertext transfer protocol: //www.scribd.com/doc/44830270/Osteomyelitis-Case-Study( Web Assignments )USING THE INTERNET, RESEARCH LITERATURE ADDRESSING MANAGEMENT OF OSTEOPOROSIS. IDENTIFY NEW MEDICATIONS ON THE Market TO TREAT THIS DISEASE.Linkss:hypertext transfer protocol: //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC493281/ hypertext transfer protocol: //www.webmd.com/osteoporosis/news/20100602/fda-approves-prolia-for-high-risk-osteoporosis As the basic aim of forestalling the advancement of osteoporosis to a patient is to minimise bone break, direction of osteoporosis is discussed in this article through many ways changing on the patient ‘s degree of break hazard. Prevention in a non medical therapy was described as holding good nutrition, healthy life style and autumn bar. Exercise and the assistance of vitamin D addendums can really assist in forestalling or decreasing the hazard of osteoporosis. Medical intervention on the other manus comes in many signifiers ; as it is to be administered based on the guidelines for get downing pharmacologic therapy. Medicines for osteoporosis direction are classified in to two, the antiresorptive agents and anabolic agents, both of which moving as agents to cut down break hazard. In the following article, a freshly approved intervention was released and approved for the direction of osteoporosis. Prolia is a biological, lab-induced intervention that is said to hold the ability to demobilize the organic structure bone ‘s breakdown mechanism. It was approved under specified types of interventions though. It can merely be administered to patients of station menopausal phase and has a high hazard of bone break caused by osteoporosis. Or to patients who already had osteoporosis interventions but had failed. Or in conclusion, to patients who ca n't digest other osteoporosis interventions. What this intervention does is to decelerate down the procedure of bone dislocation, doing the patient less susceptible to cram break. In malice of the advantages of the said intervention though, side effects to this intervention besides has its downsides. Most common of which is the patients experiencing back, musculus, and bone strivings. It is through this ground that pat ients with low degrees of Ca were besides prevented to utilize this sort of interventionFind A REASEARCH ARTICLE COMPARING PRIMARY BONE TUMORS TO METASTATIC BONE TUMORS. SUMMARIZE IN TERMS OF MANAGEMENT.hypertext transfer protocol: //www.merckmanuals.com/professional/sec04/ch044/ch044d.html Primary & A ; metastatic bone tumours fundamentally differ from its beginning. As primary tumour are defined as tumours which have started from the bone itself, metastatic tumours, besides known as secondary tumours are defined as tumours which have originated from another parts of the organic structure that had resulted to or affected the bone every bit good. As primary bone tumours are treated the same as with other tumours found in the other parts of the organic structure. Patients besides undergo radiation and chemotherapy every bit good as surgery. For painful vertebral break, Kyphoplasty or vertebraplasty are besides considered as options to relieve hurting. Metastatic bone tumours on the other are treated the same as with primary bone tumours though since it has its beginning from a different country, intervention are to be considered depending on how it will impact the full organic structure of the patient or all of which that is with tumour ( chest, lung, prostate, etc. )

Dear Doug 1

Dear Doug I am glad to hear that you are settled in and that everything is well. It is also a relief to hear that you and your roommate seem to be getting along and I hope that your friendship with Nathan will grow. I have thought about your questions and decided on some ways to help you explain, and help Nathan interpret and understand Christianity. In my life I have experienced the same situation you mentioned about Christian terminology and what it means to be a Christian.I grew up in a Christian home under Christian principles and it had not occurred to me â€Å"why do I believe in Christianity†? Of course this did not occur to me until I was older and had thought about it for some time. I thought about this world and how it could have been created not by mere chance but by something or someone far more intelligent than mere humans, not by chance. This universe and everything in it was created with superior intelligence and for a purpose.I looked into Christianity and saw how God created the earth; a being far above humans because we were made by him; a perfect powerful all knowing being who created us in his likeness to serve a distinct purpose in this world, rather than leaving it up to mere chance. I knew there had to be a reason for this world and a good one! I looked farther into Christianity and the story of how God created the earth called the Gospel. I am sure you have heard of the Gospel and read the story, but you must take into account many things before you explain it to a non-Christian.Many non-Christians are not familiar with Christian terminology because they have not looked into Christianity and read the Bible to understand our belief, and we as Christ’s followers must explain the Gospel in a simplified way for people who are not familiar with certain Christian terminology so they can understand the concept and become more familiar with the terminology. One way you can simplify the meaning of these words is to define them and s implify them in a way that you clearly present the meaning of that word.An example would be instead of saying we are sinful people, you could say we are disobedient or you could define sin as bad behavior or actions that you commit. Use words that people use on regular bases to define a certain word, which will give them a better understanding since they already understand the correct meaning of that word to better understand any Christian terminology. You may not have known, but you have already or at least started to formulate and create your own worldview. A worldview is exactly what it sounds like, it’s the way we interpret, understand, and our opinion about the world and how we view it.A worldview is how you see the world and your opinion or idea of reality. Norman Geisler and William Watkins give a very well thought out worldview explanation and an example that may help you understand, â€Å"It is an interpretive framework through which or by which one makes sense of t he data of life and the world. † A worldview is like a pair of glasses and the only way to view the world and everything in it, is through the pair of glasses, and like the prescription of glasses, everyone’s worldview is different. Now that I have given you an understanding of a worldview I will do my best to explain to you what a Christian worldview is.A Christian worldview would basically be a Christian influence on how you shape your worldview. A Christian worldview would be based on Christian principles that you’ve read and learned about in your life. How you view the world and reality would be based on Christian morals and ethics rather than a different world view based on society’s standards. A Christian worldview is typically a brighter more positive outlook on life rather than a worldview not based on Christianity; it gives you more of a purpose and reason for the questions what? , why? , and how? Your last question I also struggled with and still do from time to time.We all know that we have accepted Christ into our hearts but the greater reason is why. I have asked this question to myself many times and sometimes feel over whelmed, but there is a reason. Take a look around this world; it is full of proof and purpose. The intelligence that was required to form this world was more than mere chance but above normal human intelligence. God a supernatural being who is perfect created this earth for a purpose and with intelligent design. You yourself were made for a purpose and you yourself are far more complex to be created out of mere chance.Also the sacrifice that God made for us to have another chance even though we wronged him, beyond human means of forgiveness, it amazes me how someone could love us so much; still wanting to obtain a relationship with us. Even when we show disobedience and repetitively wrong God he will still forgive us if we truly and honestly ask for forgiveness from him. He gave us free will to make our own decisions to disobey him or to love him. I hope that this letter has assisted you in understanding your questions and I would be glad to attempt and answer more, so keep thinking and writing! I hope everything with your roommate goes well, Daniel

What Is a Decomposition Reaction

A decomposition reaction is a type of chemical reaction in which one reactant yields two or more products. The general form for a decomposition reaction is: AB → A B Decomposition reactions are also known as analysis reactions or chemical breakdowns. The opposite of this type of reaction is a synthesis, in which simpler reactants combine to form a more complex product. You can recognize this type of reaction by looking for a single reactant with multiple products. In certain circumstances, decomposition reactions are undesirable. However, they are intentionally caused and analyzed in mass spectrometry, gravimetric analysis, and thermogravimetric analysis. Decomposition Reaction Examples Water can be separated by electrolysis into hydrogen gas and oxygen gas through a decomposition reaction: 2 HAnother example of this type of reaction is the spontaneous decomposition of hydrogen peroxide into water and oxygen: 2 HThe decomposition of potassium chlorate into potassium chloride and oxygen is yet another example: 2 KClO